The great gender divide ‐ does it really exist?
In: Young consumers: insight and ideas for responsible marketers, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 53-56
ISSN: 1758-7212
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Young consumers: insight and ideas for responsible marketers, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 53-56
ISSN: 1758-7212
In: Law & policy, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 284-309
ISSN: 1467-9930
This article critically examines how interactions between social movement activism, supermarkets, and the pork industry led to the voluntary adoption of "sow stall free" standards in Australia. We "backwards map" the regulatory space behind "sow stall free" products to show how the movement against factory farming became selectively focused on the abolition of one form of confinement for sows rather than on other forms of confinement and the conditions of the sows' offspring, the piglets that are consumed. We argue that this facilitated an incremental shift to "sow stall free" production, allowing the concept of pig welfare to be corporatized in a way that maintains the dominant model of factory farmed pig meat production.
In: Law & Policy, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 284-309
SSRN
In: Journal of Law and Society, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 341-369
SSRN
In: Michelle Phillipov and Katherine Kirkwood (eds), Alternative Food Politics: From the Margins to the Mainstream, Routledge (Critical Food Series, 2018), Forthcoming
SSRN
Objective: The present article tracks the development of the Australian National Food Plan as a 'whole of government' food policy that aimed to integrate elements of nutrition and sustainability alongside economic objectives. Design: The article uses
BASE
Objective: The present article tracks the development of the Australian National Food Plan as a 'whole of government' food policy that aimed to integrate elements of nutrition and sustainability alongside economic objectives. Design: The article uses
BASE
In: Regulation & governance, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 368-387
ISSN: 1748-5991
AbstractIn Australia, labeling for consumer choice, rather than higher government regulation, has become an important strand of the policy approach to addressing food animal welfare. This paper illustrates the usefulness of "regulatory network analysis" to uncover the potentials and limitations of market‐based governance to address contentious yet significant issues like animal welfare. We analyzed the content of newspaper articles from major Australian newspapers and official policy documents between 1990 and 2014 to show how the regulatory network influenced the framing of the regulatory problem, and the capacity and legitimacy of different regulatory actors at three "flashpoints" of decisionmaking about layer hen welfare in egg production. We suggest that the government policy of offering consumers the choice to buy cage free in the market allowed large‐scale industry to continue the egg laying business as usual with incremental innovation and adjustment. These incremental improvements only apply to the 20 percent or so of hens producing "free‐range" eggs. We conclude with a discussion of when and how labeling for consumer choice might create markets and public discourses that make possible more effective and legitimate regulation of issues such as layer hen welfare.
Date:2008 ; Made available via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT)
BASE